AIRank Pricing (2026): Sites, Keywords, Models, and Rollback

This is a documentation-based buyer guide, not a hands-on review. AEOeye did not install AIRank, approve edge rewrites, run a paid account, or validate citation or output claims. The plan details below were checked against AIRank’s official site and getting-started documentation on October 2, 2026. Treat unlisted limits and performance claims as unverified until AIRank confirms them for your account.

Table of contents

• What are the publicly listed AIRank plans and prices?
• Is AIRank free, and how does that differ from a guarantee?
• How do scans, models, sites, pages, and keywords differ by tier?
• What does the simple allocation math say about each plan?
• What risks come with edge injection and automated rewrites?
• When does Scale make sense for an agency or API workflow?
• What should you check before buying AIRank?
• Frequently asked questions

What are the publicly listed AIRank plans and prices?

AIRank’s publicly described paid plans are Solo at $29 per month, Pro at $49 per month, and Scale at $199 per month. Enterprise is referenced for SSO, SOC 2, and a named customer success manager, but no public Enterprise price was verified. The official site also describes a free tier tracking one domain; it does not state additional free-tier limits that should be assumed.

These are documentation facts, not a promise that every account will receive identical operational behavior. Ask for the current order form, retention policy, and overage rules before committing budget.

Is AIRank free, and how does that differ from a guarantee?

Yes, AIRank documents a free scan that requires no credit card, and its official site describes a free tier tracking one domain. That makes a low-friction first look possible. It does not establish that every scan type or export is free.

The paid tiers advertise a 14-day money-back guarantee. A money-back guarantee is not the same as a free trial: it may involve payment first and refund conditions. Confirm the exact eligibility window, cancellation process, taxes, and whether API or rewrite usage affects eligibility.

Do not treat the free scan as proof of citation quality, rankings, traffic lift, or future coverage. Those outcomes require a repeatable baseline and before-and-after measurement. Compare AIRank’s workflow with a focused ChatGPT visibility checker and document what each actually observes.

How do scans, models, sites, pages, and keywords differ by tier?

The important distinction is the operating envelope. Solo lists one domain and one site, 100 pages, 25 tracked keywords, weekly scans, and ChatGPT and Perplexity monitoring. Pro expands to three sites and 1,000 pages, adds daily scans and pings, four models, and three competitors. Scale lists ten sites, unlimited pages, roughly three-hour scans, five team seats, white-label reports, and an API.

Several terms deserve confirmation before you compare vendors. “Four models” is a count, not a complete list of engines or a guarantee that each model is available for every scan. “Unlimited pages” does not answer crawl rate, rendering, storage, or fair-use questions. “Pings” may mean notifications rather than additional full scans.

For broader context, see AEOeye’s AI search monitoring guide, which separates scan cadence from whether prompts represent real buying journeys.

What does the simple allocation math say about each plan?

At the listed monthly prices, paying monthly for a full year costs $348 for Solo, $588 for Pro, and $2,388 for Scale. These calculations do not include tax, negotiated terms, or unlisted overages.

• Solo: $29 per month, with one listed site, so the simple bundle allocation is $29 per included site.
• Pro: $49 per month across three listed sites, or $16.33 per included site.
• Scale: $199 per month across ten listed sites, or $19.90 per included site.

Those are simple bundle allocations, not AIRank unit prices.

Page allocation tells a similar story. Solo lists 100 pages for one site. Pro lists 1,000 pages for three sites; divided evenly, that is about 333 pages per site. The split is only arithmetic, and Scale’s “unlimited pages” still needs operational clarification.

No annual discount was verified. Do not model annual savings or hidden commitments until AIRank puts those terms in writing. AEOeye’s guide to structured data for AI covers the separate content-foundation budget.

What risks come with edge injection and automated rewrites?

An auto-fix platform must earn trust with preview, approval, rollback, and measured before-and-after evidence—not claims. Pro’s listed edge injection and rewrites with rollback are potentially useful, but the public description does not explain approval gates, affected routes, cache behavior, or ownership.

Before enabling an edge change, ask to see:

• a preview or diff of every proposed rewrite;
• an explicit human approval step and permission model;
• rollback timing, scope, and audit history;
• an exclusion list for checkout, login, legal, and sensitive paths;
• evidence that canonical tags, structured data, redirects, and accessibility remain intact;
• a measured baseline and a defined success metric after release.

Rollback is a safety feature, not evidence that a rewrite is correct. Start with a narrow, non-critical section and retain your own change log. An AI crawler list can support a separate review of which agents you want to monitor; it does not substitute for release governance.

When does Scale make sense for an agency or API workflow?

Scale is the first publicly listed tier that clearly targets multi-site operations: ten sites, unlimited pages, five team seats, white-label reports, roughly three-hour scans, and a REST API with a stated 10,000-per-day limit. That combination can fit an agency or in-house team that needs client-facing reporting and programmatic access.

The API limit is stated as 10,000 per day. Confirm what counts as a request, whether the limit is hard or soft, authentication, response retention, and whether white-label exports consume the same allowance. Ask about viewer roles and additional-seat pricing.

Scale is not automatically the best value for a small portfolio. Three sites, daily monitoring, and four models point to Pro; one site, weekly checks, and 25 keywords point to Solo. Agencies should compare reporting workflow against best AI visibility tools.

What should you check before buying AIRank?

Use this checklist during a trial, demo, or procurement call:

1. Confirm models, prompt volume, page handling, crawl frequency, and retention for your plan.
2. Ask whether “site,” “domain,” and “tracked keyword” have different definitions.
3. Request annual pricing, renewal terms, overages, and the 14-day money-back conditions.
4. For rewrites, require preview, approval, rollback, audit logs, and a safe-path allowlist.
5. For API use, confirm the 10,000/day definition, rate limits, authentication, and support.
6. Build a prompt and competitor baseline before judging visibility changes.

The strongest buying decision is the one tied to a measurable workflow. Do not purchase a promise of rankings or citations; purchase a clearly bounded system you can inspect, govern, and compare over time.

For adjacent pricing models, compare GeoStars Pricing and Geopher.ai Pricing. Keep the same prompt, engine, brand, and billing assumptions across all three.

Frequently asked questions

Is AIRank free to use?

AIRank documents a free scan requiring no credit card and describes a free tier tracking one domain. Additional free limits were not verified, so confirm them before planning ongoing monitoring.

How much does AIRank cost per year?

At monthly billing for twelve months, Solo is $348, Pro is $588, and Scale is $2,388. No annual discount was verified.

Does AIRank offer a free trial?

The paid tiers advertise a 14-day money-back guarantee. That is not the same as a free trial; confirm payment and refund conditions directly with AIRank.

Which AIRank plan is best for an agency?

Scale is the clearest documented agency fit because it lists ten sites, five seats, white-label reports, and a REST API. Pro may fit a smaller portfolio needing three sites and daily scans.

For safer content operations, start with a narrow baseline, require evidence for every change, and keep automated publishing behind approval.