Profound vs Semrush for AI Visibility (2026): Which Fits?

Pick Semrush if you already do SEO there and want a priced, bounded AI visibility add-on for one or a few domains. Pick Profound if AI visibility is its own channel, run by a named owner across many brands, and you can buy through sales. This comparison is based on public documentation as of October 2026; we have not tested either product hands-on.
Which should you choose, Profound or Semrush?
Choose by who will use the data, not by feature count. Semrush is the better default for small teams, agencies and mid-market companies. Profound earns its quote-only price when you need scale, history, shopping data or content agents.
Semrush's own documentation says its toolkit is built with SMBs, agencies, and mid-market companies in mind. Profound's pricing page offers brands a free 7-day Trial and an Enterprise plan with a "Custom" price. That split in audience is the clearest difference between them.
Our position: for most teams reading this, the first tool should be the one they will open weekly, and that is usually the one already holding their SEO data. Buy the dedicated platform when you can name the person who will use its extra depth.
What does Semrush offer for AI visibility?
Semrush offers AI visibility in two shapes: a stand-alone AI Visibility Toolkit and AI features inside its SEO plans. Both are public and priced as of October 3, 2026, which makes Semrush easy to budget and easy to start.
- Stand-alone toolkit: $99 a month per domain, billed annually, with 25 custom prompts tracked daily and mentions from ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini and Perplexity. Extra users start at $45 a month. Enterprise is custom.
- SEO + AI Search plans: the main pricing page lists Starter at $199 a month ($165.17 billed annually) with 50 daily prompts, Pro+ at $299 ($248.17) with 100, and Advanced at $549 ($455.67) with 200. These plans also carry SEO limits such as 500 to 5,000 tracked keywords.
The documented reports are Visibility Overview, Competitor Research, Prompt Research, Brand Performance, Prompt Tracking and an AI Search Site Audit. The overview draws on a database of 317M+ AI queries, while Prompt Tracking runs your own prompts daily on ChatGPT Search, Google AI Mode and Gemini.
Two details to check before buying. The pricing page lists Perplexity among the Base plan's mentions, but the Prompt Tracking guide names only those three engines. And the knowledge base says the toolkit has no free trial, while the pricing page advertises a seven-day trial for its SEO plans.
What does Profound offer?
Profound offers deeper tracking and an agent layer, sold through a free Trial and a quote-only Enterprise plan. As of October 3, 2026, its pricing page shows no public monthly price for brands.
- Trial (free): 50 prompts run daily for 7 days on ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews, with a fixed prompt set, no exports and no history.
- Enterprise (custom): a tailored prompt plan, up to nine engines (adding Perplexity, Google AI Mode, Microsoft Copilot, DeepSeek, Claude and Exa Search), all-time history, CSV and JSON exports, API access, SSO and dedicated support.
- Beyond tracking: Agent Analytics reads server logs for AI bot traffic, Shopping covers ChatGPT Shopping at SKU level, and AI Marketer agents run on credits.
Its help center defines the core metrics: visibility score, share of voice, average position, citations, sentiment and FactCheck. For setup effort and who it suits, see our Profound review.

Dedicated or all-in-one: what is the real trade-off?
The trade-off is breadth of context against depth of AI data. An all-in-one suite puts AI visibility next to your keywords, audits and backlinks; a dedicated platform puts more AI-specific data, scale and controls in one place and nothing else.
| Semrush (AI Visibility, SEO + AI Search) | Profound | |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $99/mo per domain (billed annually); SEO + AI from $165.17/mo (billed annually) | Free 7-day Trial; Enterprise quote-only |
| Prompts tracked | 25 to 200 daily, by plan | Custom; Trial 50 for 7 days |
| Engines | ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini (Perplexity listed on pricing) | Trial 3; Enterprise up to 9 |
| Your SEO data | Same login: keywords, audits, backlinks | Not part of its listed plans |
| AI bot traffic | AI Search Site Audit (up to 100 pages on Base) | Agent Analytics from server logs |
| Shopping data | Not listed for AI Visibility | ChatGPT Shopping, SKU level |
| History, exports, API | 10 CSV exports a day; API on Advanced and Enterprise | All-time history, CSV/JSON, API on Enterprise |
| Content workflows | SEO content tools in the suite | Agents with approval steps |
Per tracked prompt, Semrush's published plans work out (our arithmetic, billed annually) at about $3.96 for Base, $3.30 for Starter, $2.48 for Pro+ and $2.28 for Advanced. The last three also include SEO tools, so that is not the pure AI cost. Profound has no comparable figure to publish.
Can you compare their visibility scores?
No, because the two scores measure different things. Compare trends inside one tool, never one tool's number against the other's. Profound's visibility score is your mentions divided by the responses that name at least one brand. Semrush's AI Visibility Score compares your mentions with the median for your top competitors, which it picks automatically.
Prompt volume matters as much. Profound's own setup guide suggests about 15 topics of 10 prompts each, roughly 150 prompts. Semrush's entry plan tracks 25. A tracked set that small tells you about your tracked questions, not your market.
Repeated runs also matter. SparkToro found under a 1-in-100 chance of ChatGPT or Google's AI giving the same brand list twice, so any single day's rank is noise.

Which AI visibility problems will each tool actually fix?
Neither fixes your visibility; both show you where it is missing. The more useful question is which gaps you have. Semrush's AI Search Site Audit flags crawl blockers and missing llms.txt files. In AEOeye's crawler access study (October 2026, 384 sites), blocking is rare for brands: 1 of 193 SaaS sites blocked any AI retrieval bot, against 27 of 38 news publishers (see the study hub).
So for a brand, the missing piece is usually citations from sources the engines read, not robots.txt. That favors whichever tool shows you cited sources and competitor gaps well, and both document that. We also think llms.txt is overrated as a ranking lever, so don't pay for an audit item alone.
What should you do before paying for either?
Test the question before the tool. The decision gets easy once you know whether AI engines already name you.
- Run a free check first. AEOeye's free audit asks ChatGPT three unbranded buyer questions and shows the full answers. The $29 one-time report adds Claude, Gemini, Google AI and Perplexity across 10 questions. It is not a daily tracker.
- List your real prompts. If you cannot name 25 buyer questions worth watching, you are not ready for either tool.
- Read both prices side by side. Use our Semrush AI Visibility pricing guide and Profound pricing guide, and the Semrush AI Toolkit review for scope.
- Widen the field. Peec AI, Otterly.AI and others sit between them on price; see the best AI visibility tools.
FAQ
Does Semrush track AI visibility?+
Yes. Semrush sells an AI Visibility Toolkit at $99 per month per domain billed annually, and bundles AI visibility into its SEO + AI Search plans. It covers visibility scores, competitor gaps, prompt research and daily tracking of custom prompts. As of October 2026 the entry plan tracks 25 prompts.
Is Profound better than Semrush for AI search?+
For depth, scale and enterprise controls, Profound's documentation shows more: up to nine engines, all-time history, API, shopping data and content agents. For price clarity, SEO data in the same login and mid-market fit, Semrush is the easier buy. Neither is better in general; the better one depends on who will use it.
Can I compare a Profound score with a Semrush score?+
No. Profound's visibility score is the share of brand-naming responses that include you. Semrush's AI Visibility Score compares your mentions with the median of your top competitors. Different formulas and different prompt sets mean the numbers cannot be compared. Compare trends inside one tool instead.
Do I need a dedicated AEO tool if I already pay for Semrush?+
Not at first. If you track a handful of prompts for one domain and already use Semrush for SEO, its AI Visibility tools may be enough. Add a dedicated platform when you manage many brands, need years of history or an API, or run AI visibility as its own budgeted channel.
Is there a cheaper way to start than either tool?+
Yes. Run a one-off check before committing to a subscription. AEOeye's free audit asks ChatGPT three buyer questions and shows the real answers and the competitors named. It is not a daily tracker, but it tells you whether you have a visibility problem worth paying to monitor.
Sources
Is AI recommending you?
Run a free AI visibility audit and find out in under a minute.