SERPRecon Pricing (2026): Credits, AI Share of Voice, and Plan Fit

SerpReCon’s published US monthly pricing, checked September 26, 2026, is Standard at $49/month for 100 report credits, Pro at $149/month for 300 credits, and Agency at $349/month for 700 credits. The plans are monthly subscriptions; the site also advertises yearly billing with savings of up to 5%, but it does not establish an exact discount for each tier. A seven-day trial is advertised. This is a documentation-based buyer guide, not a hands-on test: the figures and feature claims below come from SerpReCon’s public pricing and product pages, not from an account AEOeye purchased or operated.

Table of contents

• What does SerpReCon cost right now?
• What do the credits and limits mean?
• Which plan fits a real AI-visibility workflow?
• How much does each report credit cost?
• What should you verify before subscribing?
• Frequently asked questions

What does SerpReCon cost right now?

SerpReCon’s price ladder is simple: $49 Standard, $149 Pro, and $349 Agency per month, with the allowance and access level increasing at each step. The important distinction is not a dramatic discount on credits; it is access to more projects, more share-of-voice (SOV) runs, and additional AI engines.

These are the published monthly figures for the US-facing pricing page. See SerpReCon’s official pricing page for the current checkout terms. The company also presents yearly billing as saving “up to 5%.” Treat that as a ceiling, not as a guaranteed 5% reduction for every tier: the public wording does not provide enough detail to calculate an exact annual invoice.

The advertised seven-day trial can reduce the risk of checking whether the interface fits your workflow. It does not answer what consumes one credit, whether unused credits roll over, or whether SOV runs use the same pool. Confirm those points before relying on a monthly forecast.

What do the credits and limits mean?

The plans appear to combine two different jobs: report production and recurring visibility measurement. Report credits are the clearest unit in the public price table. SOV runs are a separate practical constraint, because a team can have credits left while reaching a plan’s run or engine limits.

Standard is the entry plan for a bounded monitoring program: 100 report credits, 10 projects or domains, and 20 Google SOV runs. That can cover one brand or a short baseline exercise, but it is tight for many markets, prompts, or client domains.

Pro removes the visible project cap and the Google SOV cap. It also adds Perplexity and ChatGPT SOV, which is a material change for an AI-search visibility program: you can compare how the same brand is represented across more than one answer engine instead of treating Google as the only visibility proxy. SerpReCon explains the SOV concept on its share-of-voice feature page.

Agency keeps those unlimited project and SOV permissions while increasing the monthly report allowance to 700 credits. That is a capacity plan, not a lower per-credit plan. The practical reason to choose it is the number of brands, clients, or reporting cycles you expect to manage—not a promise that each individual report becomes substantially cheaper.

The public pricing table does not explain every credit event in enough detail to model a complete audit. A “credit” may map to a report or another documented unit; this article does not infer hidden overage rules. Ask for the exact consumption definition, rollover policy, and overage treatment before putting the subscription into a client contract.

Which plan fits a real AI-visibility workflow?

Choose Standard for a small, Google-centered baseline within 10 domains.

Choose Pro when cross-engine visibility matters. Perplexity and ChatGPT SOV, plus unlimited projects and SOV, matter more than the extra 200 credits alone. It is the first tier visibly built for a broader answer-engine comparison.

Choose Agency when 300 credits is not enough for your brands or reporting cycles. If you will not use hundreds of report units or manage multiple domains, the $200 monthly jump from Pro is difficult to defend on price alone.

The buying question is not simply “Which plan has the lowest cost per credit?” It is “Which plan lets me measure the engines, domains, and cadence that matter?” Pair competitor data with a direct baseline from AEOeye’s ChatGPT visibility checker.

How much does each report credit cost?

You can reproduce the nominal monthly credit ratio with one division:

monthly price ÷ included report credits = nominal price per credit

Using the published figures:

• Standard: $49 ÷ 100 = $0.49 per nominal credit.
• Pro: $149 ÷ 300 = $0.4967, or about $0.497.
• Agency: $349 ÷ 700 = $0.4986, or about $0.499.

The result is nearly flat: the larger plans do not create a meaningful credit discount. That is the most useful pricing insight in the table. Standard is not an artificially expensive sampler, and Agency is not a bulk-credit bargain. The value of Pro and Agency comes from access and scale—unlimited projects, broader SOV coverage, and larger capacity.

Here is a reproducible planning example. Suppose a team expects 250 report credits in one monthly cycle and needs Perplexity plus ChatGPT SOV. Standard cannot meet both requirements because it includes only 100 credits and does not list those engines. Pro covers the forecast within its 300-credit allowance at $149 for that month. The nominal unused capacity is 50 credits; do not treat it as a refund or rollover unless the terms explicitly say so.

For an agency forecasting 600 credits, Agency covers the allowance at $349/month. The same calculation gives $349 ÷ 700 ≈ $0.499 per nominal credit. That is a comparison aid, not a billing guarantee if SOV runs, retries, or exports consume units differently.

What should you verify before subscribing?

Start with the official documentation, not a reseller summary. Read the SerpReCon homepage alongside the pricing page and SOV feature description. Ask four questions in writing:

1. What exactly consumes one report credit, and do SOV runs consume credits too?
2. Do unused credits roll over, expire, or reset at renewal?
3. What happens if a team exceeds the monthly allowance—pause, overage billing, or an upgrade prompt?
4. Does the seven-day trial include every engine and SOV feature shown on the plan table?

Keep the answer with your purchasing record. Also check whether “unlimited” means unlimited runs, unlimited tracked projects, or both. The table presents it for projects/domains and SOV on Pro and Agency, but your implementation plan still needs exact usage terms.

For a broader comparison, AEOeye’s AI visibility tracker guide explains what to measure, while the AEO audit checklist turns observations into an actionable review. For adjacent tools, see the Geordy pricing guide and Koalr pricing guide, then normalize each product’s units before comparing totals.

Frequently asked questions

Is SerpReCon cheaper on yearly billing?

SerpReCon advertises yearly savings of up to 5%, but the public wording does not establish an exact discount for each plan. Verify the annual checkout total before treating a 5% reduction as your budget number.

Which SerpReCon plan includes Perplexity and ChatGPT SOV?

The published table lists Perplexity and ChatGPT SOV for Pro and Agency. Standard lists Google SOV runs but does not list those two additional engines.

Does Agency offer a better credit price than Pro?

No meaningful credit discount is visible from the published numbers. Pro is about $0.497 per nominal credit and Agency about $0.499, so Agency’s reason to exist is capacity and scale.

Is this a hands-on SerpReCon review?

No. It is a documentation-based pricing guide checked September 26, 2026. The figures are from SerpReCon’s public pages; no SerpReCon account was purchased or operated for this article.

If you want a free, direct starting point for your own brand, run an AEOeye snapshot with the ChatGPT visibility checker. It gives you a baseline question to take into any paid visibility-tool evaluation.